<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Welcome, iPad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://monicabulger.com/2010/01/welcome-ipad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://monicabulger.com/2010/01/welcome-ipad/</link>
	<description>The Search Myth: Quality Information is Not a Click Away</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:05:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monica</title>
		<link>http://monicabulger.com/2010/01/welcome-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Monica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monicabulger.com/?p=342#comment-226</guid>
		<description>I want to argue that serendipity is limited by whatever is in the catalog, and that &lt;em&gt;access&lt;/em&gt; may be prioritized over &lt;em&gt;quality&lt;/em&gt; in criteria for inclusion. I also want to use browsing bookshelves in the library as an example of research serendipity -- finding the exact section of interest and then perusing the shelves. But I see problems with both arguments.
Also, I&#039;ve found Amazon&#039;s suggestions for texts I&#039;d like pretty serendipitous...Netflix as well. Not always, and not usually, but enough to make me pause before arguing that we&#039;re completely losing it. So, serendipity may be different digitally, but not non-existent. 
There&#039;s a certain quiet in my mind when I&#039;m wandering bookshelves, though, and I feel the opposite when looking for texts online -- frantic is a better description, rushed, urgent, only because there&#039;s so much to search through. This is a different argument, though, but important when considering serendipitous moments. I can&#039;t really experience the luxury of seeing connections or the space to find them if I&#039;m overwhelmed by information. With bookshelves, I can see the end of the space. I know the scope of my options. With online texts and music stores, Google Books for example, or Apple iTunes, the options seem endless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to argue that serendipity is limited by whatever is in the catalog, and that <em>access</em> may be prioritized over <em>quality</em> in criteria for inclusion. I also want to use browsing bookshelves in the library as an example of research serendipity &#8212; finding the exact section of interest and then perusing the shelves. But I see problems with both arguments.<br />
Also, I&#8217;ve found Amazon&#8217;s suggestions for texts I&#8217;d like pretty serendipitous&#8230;Netflix as well. Not always, and not usually, but enough to make me pause before arguing that we&#8217;re completely losing it. So, serendipity may be different digitally, but not non-existent.<br />
There&#8217;s a certain quiet in my mind when I&#8217;m wandering bookshelves, though, and I feel the opposite when looking for texts online &#8212; frantic is a better description, rushed, urgent, only because there&#8217;s so much to search through. This is a different argument, though, but important when considering serendipitous moments. I can&#8217;t really experience the luxury of seeing connections or the space to find them if I&#8217;m overwhelmed by information. With bookshelves, I can see the end of the space. I know the scope of my options. With online texts and music stores, Google Books for example, or Apple iTunes, the options seem endless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertil Hatt</title>
		<link>http://monicabulger.com/2010/01/welcome-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertil Hatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monicabulger.com/?p=342#comment-225</guid>
		<description>You are not loosing serendipity, but you can have random, or thoughtful serendipty, and you can have it all the time: when you are bored (and your iPad notices you don&#039;t flip the pages as you used to) when you are finished, when you just bought one (not ideal on that device) but more importanlty, when you are far away from a bookshop.
I live atop of the most beautiful bookstore in the world: I don&#039;t have to put on shoes to go there, and trust me I&#039;m there all the time:
http://galignani.com/en/galignani.php

But even I can tell you: that device will make me read and buy more books. Ask any Kindle reader. I&#039;ll probably spend more time making presentations on it—but still. Ether is the best bookstore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are not loosing serendipity, but you can have random, or thoughtful serendipty, and you can have it all the time: when you are bored (and your iPad notices you don&#8217;t flip the pages as you used to) when you are finished, when you just bought one (not ideal on that device) but more importanlty, when you are far away from a bookshop.<br />
I live atop of the most beautiful bookstore in the world: I don&#8217;t have to put on shoes to go there, and trust me I&#8217;m there all the time:<br />
<a href="http://galignani.com/en/galignani.php" rel="nofollow">http://galignani.com/en/galignani.php</a></p>
<p>But even I can tell you: that device will make me read and buy more books. Ask any Kindle reader. I&#8217;ll probably spend more time making presentations on it—but still. Ether is the best bookstore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

